Published on

DeFi Godfather: Presidents are “flushing” on our heads

Authors

Dozens of wallets spent millions of dollars to collect LIBRA just before the Argentine President shill on X, then took profits at a profit tens of times more. DeFi godfather Andre Cronje has expressed his thoughts on the matter.

On February 15, while the crypto community was still debating whether LIBRA was a mainstream project or just a rug pull, Andre Cronje, who has been dubbed the Godfather of DeFi, made a notable comment on X.

He argues that the current market landscape is a far cry from the early days of crypto, where debates mostly revolve around issues of wallet control or security mechanisms.

Now, presidents and nations are directly pumping and dumping memento on our heads, in true financial crime style.
Andre Cronje shared.
Invite your friends
Andre Cronje criticized the Argentine president's return to the promotion of the creation of the memento coin.

When asked if there were any regrets about returning to the crypto industry amid the current turmoil, Cronje insisted this did not affect his work.

He thinks that memenoin has a completely different group of investors from those interested in decentralized finance (DeFi) or real blockchain, so these developments to him are merely entertaining.

After Argentine President Javier Milei's X account posted about the LIBRA token, the market saw a spike, but soon after, on-chain data showed unusual trades from individuals who were likely insiders.

According to the analysis from EmberCN, some wallets took advantage of the moment before the post appeared to prepare to withdraw cash, then quickly execute trades in the first second when LIBRA was announced.

 

疑似阿根廷总统发行的 Meme 代币 $LIBRA 内幕交易人士,通过 $LIBRA 至少获利了 $2018 万。 细节: 1⃣在推文发布前的几个小时里,通过 Binance、Bybit、Kucoin 等 CEX 提出 USDC 及 SOL 准备资金; 2⃣在阿根廷总统推文发布的第一秒狙击买入; 3⃣在市场将 $LIBRA 拉升后分批全部售出。 至少有 3

Image
Image
Image
145
Reply

Specifically, at least three major trades show signs of insider trading:

  • One million USDC was used to buy 3.34 million LIBRA, which was later sold for a profit of $8.58 million.
  • USD1.5 million was used to purchase 5.10 million LIBRA, and resold it for a profit of $6.45 million.
  • 500,000 USDC bought 1.97 million LIBRA, earning $5.15 million after the sale.

In total, these trades raised at least $20.18 million, raising the question of whether someone knew the information in advance and taking advantage of the wave of FOMO from the market to take profits as soon as the price went up.

The LIBRA memento event is becoming one of the most notable incidents of the year, raising a series of questions about whether this was a scheme from a major financial institution, a move by the Argentine government, or simply an elaborately staged scam?